Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). Still, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff XR and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
