Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
