Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
