Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
