Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
