Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Catana FE 1000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Shimano Catana FE 1000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
