Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
