Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
