Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 1000X and Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana FE 1000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €30.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
