Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
