Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa BG
Spinning
57.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.82 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight640g / 22.58oz
Line retireve per crank120 centimeter / 47.24 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €115.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/430
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX and Daiwa BG 5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch, while Daiwa BG 5000X stands out for a durability of 7.82 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa BG?
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa BG 5000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
