Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Delphin BRONZ?
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
