Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
