Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
