Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Shimano Catana FE 2500X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Catana FE 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Delphin BRONZ?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
