Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 2500X and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 2500X offers a maximum drag of 4kg / 8,82lbs, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
