Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano Catana FE 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs). Still, Shimano Catana FE 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
