Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 2500X offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
