Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
