Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (135g / 4,76oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.1 out of 10 (135g / 4,76oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
