Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X
