Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Shimano Catana FE

Spinning

53.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.74 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight320g / 11.29oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €34.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

89.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.58 out of 10) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.