Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (150g / 5,29oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
