Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X edges out Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.59 out of 10) and the weight (200g / 7,05oz). Still, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
