Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
81.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €385.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (420g / 14,82oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX
- Scoring 8.8 out of 10 (420g / 14,82oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
