Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Torium
Multireels
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight600g / 21.16oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3 S-ARB + 1RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €179.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX edges out Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.6 out of 10) and the weight (600g / 21,16oz). Still, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch and a gear ratio of 5.8:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Torium?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (600g / 21,16oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
