Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX edges out Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the weight (245g / 8,64oz). Still, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.8:1 and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X
