Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X
