Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (150g / 5,29oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
