Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 4000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana FE 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 30X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
