Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
