Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
