Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X

Shimano Catana FE, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, CAT4000FE
Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €34.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Shimano Sienna, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, front drag, SN4000FG
Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €27.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Both Shimano Catana FE 4000X and Shimano Sienna 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana FE 4000X offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Shimano Sienna 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Sienna?

There are not much differences between the two comparables