Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (245g / 8,64oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
