Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano Catana FE

Spinning

63.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.67 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €30.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

86.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.54 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight138g / 4.87oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Abu GARCIA Zenon?

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX

8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues