Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano Catana FE, C 3000 HG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, CATC3000HGFE
Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €30.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC 3000 HG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2000 S-H, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-200
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000 S-H
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the total score (8 out of 10). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables