Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX
