Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
