Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
