Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
