Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
