Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.92 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
