Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) and the gear ratio (6.0:1). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
