Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin INKS 6000X

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
