Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
