Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.92 out of 10) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
