Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.92 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
