Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.36 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
