Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa GS LTD 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and total score (8.36 out of 10). While Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa GS LTD?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
