Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Complex XR 2500X and Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR 2500X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX stands out for a ball bearings of 6+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Stradic FM?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
