Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Complex XR 2500X and Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR 2500X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX stands out for a ball bearings of 6+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Stradic FM?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa BG 5000X
